My statement
In 2023, someone accused me of sexual assault. After investigation by Taiwan’s judicial authorities, the case was avoided due to insufficient evidence. However, the Gender Equity Committee at National Tsing Hua University conducted its own investigation and ruled that my ‘sexual harassment’ was established despite the same incident and lack of sufficient evidence. This conclusion not only contradicts the judgment of the judicial authorities but is also shocking and seriously undermines the credibility of the procedure.
I solemnly declare: I respect the school system and the value of gender equality, but I firmly believe the Gender Equality Committee’s ruling does not match the facts. The evidence is clearly insufficient and constitutes a serious error in judgment. I have filed an appeal in accordance with statutory and internal school procedures, and will continue to pursue fairness according to the law. If the subsequent review process still fails to clarify the facts and clear my name, after receiving the paper judgment, I will discuss with my lawyer whether to appeal to protect my personal reputation and basic rights.
I understand the public’s emphasis on gender equality issues and appreciate the attention from all sectors. However, as the case still awaits judicial review, I urge the public to approach this matter with rationality and fairness, to avoid unnecessary misunderstandings and harm caused by unverified information.
I will continue to respond to this matter in a lawful and peaceful manner, maintaining faith in truth and justice. At the same time, the various public projects I am currently promoting—including the construction and operation of the Los Angeles June Fourth Memorial Hall, preparations for the ‘State Conference,’ promoting unity among overseas democratic forces, and advancing the establishment of opposition alliances—will not be affected by this incident. I will continue to dedicate myself to this as always, striving for freedom, justice, and social progress.
We sincerely hope that friends from all walks of life can understand, trust, and continue to offer support.
Wang Dan
2025.11.6.
Source: Wang Dan’s Facebook
Hu Ping: Li Yuanjun’s accusations of sexual harassment against Wang Dan are not established
June 14, 2023
Even based on Li Yuanjun’s one-sided account, we can conclude that his accusations of sexual harassment against Wang Dan are unfounded.
1. According to Li Yuanjun’s account, both Li Yuanjun and Wang Dan are homosexual, and both know the other is gay.
2. When Wang Dan invited Li Yuanjun to the United States to “broaden his horizons,” Li Yuanjun should have realized that this showed Wang Dan’s interest in him; Otherwise, as a newcomer to social movement work and just acquainted with Wang Dan, why would Wang Dan insist on inviting him to the U.S. to “broaden his horizons”? Wang Dan did not invite a tour group or a visiting group; Li Yuanjun was invited as part of that group. Wang Dan invited Li Yuanjun personally, and Li Yuanjun was invited as an individual. The meaning contained in this should be quite clear.
3. Regarding Wang Dan, when Wang Dan saw Li Yuanjun gladly agree, he naturally thought it meant Li Yuanjun was willing. So when Li Yuanjun came to New York and they were alone, he hugged and kissed Li Yuanjun and tried to have relations with him.
4. Li Yuanjun said he had just undergone surgery when Wang Dan stopped moving.
5. Because Li Yuanjun said he had just undergone surgery, Wang Dan thought Li Yuanjun’s refusal at the time was just inconvenient, not unwilling, so he later said some words to express his willingness; But only words, no action.
6. Afterwards, seeing that Li Yuanjun did not respond, Wang Dan stopped responding.
Throughout the entire process, Wang Dan subjectively did not act against Li Yuanjun’s wishes. In other words, Wang Dan’s actions toward Li were all based on his belief that Li Yuanjun was willing, so it was not sexual harassment. Once Li Yuanjun expressed his refusal—whether out of unwillingness or inconvenience—Wang Dan never took any further action, showing that he respected the other’s will. Therefore, Wang Dan did not sexually harass Li Yuanjun.
To put it another way, even if Li Yuanjun had previously accepted Wang Dan’s invitation to the U.S. not because he wanted to develop a relationship with Wang Dan, in reality, he was simply thinking it would be a waste not to come; Even if he told Wang Dan that he just had surgery as an excuse, he was actually unwilling. He should have known that his behavior was too likely to cause Wang Dan’s “misunderstanding,” so Wang Dan’s actions were understandable and not sexual harassment, so he should not be blamed.
Some things aren’t a problem between the same sex, but the problem is between the opposite sex. For example, if a man takes off his pants in front of a woman, it is seen as being a pervert; But if she takes off her pants in front of a man, it doesn’t count as being a pervert. Moreover, the relationship between homosexuals differs from that between typical same-sex and heterosexual relationships. Certain words and actions between men and women are considered sexual harassment if they happen between men and women, but if they happen between men and women, they are not. It is understood that in gay bars or clubs, Mr. A kissed and hugged Mr. B before obtaining Mr. B’s consent. This kind of thing is not uncommon. Generally, it is not considered a problem. If B says he doesn’t want to, A insists on doing it. That’s what might be a problem.
Moreover, regarding Li Yuanjun’s case, Li Yuanjun gladly accepted Wang Dan’s invitation to come to the United States, so Wang Dan’s actions were not problematic.
Conclusion: Li Yuanjun’s accusation against Wang Dan of sexual harassment against him is unfounded.
Note: I’m not saying Li Yuanjun’s accusations lack sufficient evidence, nor that the truth of what Li Yuanjun said is unverified or lacking evidence. What I mean is, even if everything Li Yuanjun said is true, his accusations of sexual harassment against Wang Dan are unfounded. This requires no further investigation or further listening to Wang Dan’s account, because simply analyzing Li Yuanjun’s texts is enough to disprove Li Yuanjun’s accusations.